|
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
An Introduction to Customer Satisfaction Theory and Measurement
What Is Satisfaction?
Satisfaction can influence post-purchase/post-experience actions (such as word of mouth effects and repeat purchase behavior) other than usage. Additional post-experience actions might include search behavior, changes in shopping behavior and trial of associated products.
Satisfaction and attitude are closely related concepts. Attitudes and satisfaction may both been defined as an evaluation of a social object and the individuals relationship to it. The distinction is that satisfaction is a "post experience" evaluation of fitness or utility of the product to produce satisfaction.
Affective Measures of Customer Satisfaction Cognitive Measures of Customer Satisfaction
Behavioral Measures of Customer Satisfaction
Expectations and Customer Satisfaction
1) Importance-Value of the product/service fulfilling the expectation;
2) Overall Affect-Satisfaction Expectations: The (liking/disliking) of the product/service;
3) Fulfillment of Expectations: the expected level of performance vs. the desired expectations. This is “Predictive Fulfillment” and is a respondent specific index of the performance level necessary to satisfy;
4) Expected Value from Use: Satisfaction is often determined by the frequency of use. If a product/service is not used as often as expected, the result may not be as satisfying as anticipated. For example a Harley Davidson that sits in the garage, an unused year subscription to the local fitness center/gym or a little used season pass to Snowbird Ski Resort would produce more dissatisfaction with the decision to purchase than with the actual product/service.
Expectancy Value Measures of Purchase Intention (BI), Attitude (A) and Satisfaction (SAT) Expectancy value models have been found to perform
well in predicting both satisfaction/dissatisfaction and behavioral intention
(intention to try, purchase, recommend, or re-purchase a product or service). The Expectancy value theory model using attitudes and beliefs reads:
where: w1, w2 = weights that indicate the relative influence of the overall attitude toward the object and the normative influence to purchase the product
∑ai * bi = the overall attitude toward the object. The overall attitude is formed by the multiplicative product of ai (the person’s affective evaluation of attribute i), and bi (here defined as the importance of attribute i in the purchase decision). The sum is taken over the k attributes that are defined as salient in the purchase decision.
∑nbi * mci = The overall normative component of the decision process. This is computed as the multiplicative product of nbi (the norms governing attitude i), and mci (the motivation of the respondent to comply with those norms).
Purchase Intention (BI) Satisfaction The like-dislike measure is used as an overall measure of respondent satisfaction with a product or service (after purchase). Satisfaction leads to favorable feelings and dissatisfaction leads to unfavorable feelings. The evaluative dimension may be measured in terms of like-dislike, favorable-unfavorable; approve-disapprove; good-bad; and delight-failure scales. Attitude (ai*bi)
ai - the evaluation of belief i. A representative measure of ai would be "In terms of buying Crest toothpaste, decay prevention is ..." with a five or seven point scale with "good" and "bad"; or “Excellent” and “Poor” at the endpoints.
Measuring Expectations
1) Expectations may not reflect unanticipated service attributes;
2) Expectations may have been quite vague, creating wide latitudes of acceptability in performance and expected satisfaction;
3) Expectation and product performance evaluations may be sensory and not cognitive, as in taste, style or image;
4) The product use may attract so little attention as to produce no conscious affect or cognition (evaluation), and result in meaningless satisfaction or dissatisfaction measures;
5) There may have been unanticipated benefits or consequences of purchasing or using the product (such as a use or feature not anticipated with purchase);
6) The original expectations may have been unrealistically high or low;
7) The product purchaser, influencer and user may
have been different individuals, each having different expectations. |